1n 1889, in the small town of Messkirch in Baden, Germany a lower middle class couple welcomed the birth of their first child, who would later go on to become a renowned philosopher. Martin Heidegger grew up in a largely catholic background and was declared a gifted child by his local priest at the young age of 14. Thus, in 1909 he began training for his priesthood, but “two years later discontinued his clerical training to focus instead on philosophy, while also undertaking work in science and math” (Sherman & Solomon, 2003, p. 144). In 1915, he married Elfride Petri and later had two children with her. After a stint of military training during WW1, as his health did not permit him to actually go to battle, he returned to teaching in universities in Germany until the end of WW2. It is also interesting to note Heidegger’s admittedly “strange relationship to Hitler’s Germany” (Naess, 1965, p.179). After the war, during de-Nazification, he was “was stripped of his professorship and banned from teaching until 1949” due to his reported Nazi sympathies during the 1930s (Sherman & Solomon, 2003, p. 178). In 1951, the University of Freiburg offered him emeritus status so that he could continue lecturing until near the end of his life in 1976.
   Though Heidegger repudiated the claim in a long open letter in 1946, he was seen as a great “existentialist” and “humanist” during his time (Naess, 1965, p. 178). He contributed greatly to the fields hermeneutics, psychology, political theory, and metaphysics. However, perhaps his greatest work was done in the field of phenomenology and the question of being. He stressed the importance of self-reflection in order to understand the being. The being’s essence is in his existence and each beings characteristic of being mine or “mineness” permits an either authentic or inauthentic way of life (Naess, 1965). Heidegger focused on “passionate thinking” and rethinking on these questions of being, presence, life, and time, and is said “to have brought thinking to life” (Sherman & Soloman, 2003, p. 146). 
    In relation to Christianity, Heidegger’s work, at face value, seems to have little relevance. His thinking seems to imply an “indifference towards theism and atheism- that it goes beyond the dilemma of theism and atheism; it shows that the question of God acquires a new focus and meaning especially in his phenomenology” (Kovacs, 1990, p. 31). Therefore, Heidegger’s study on the Being invites us not to disregard the God question but to see the God question in a new light. Kovacs says that “the understanding of the difference between the Being and God is the mountaintop from which one is allowed to view the distance which separates the phenomenological notion of God from the metaphysical idea of the highest being” (1990, p. 36). As Christians are notorious for making Christ in their own image, subscribing to Heidegger’s idea understanding the Being- that is ourselves even- would help us understand God better. 
 


Leave a Reply