Dubbed the ‘father of existentialism’, the Danish philosopher Soren Aabye Kierkegaard was born in 1813, the same year as a state wide bankruptcy in Denmark. Despite the economic turmoil surrounding his birth, Kierkegaard’s beginnings were not so dire. Though he was the last of seven children, his father was a wealthy man, who had made his fortune in the trades at a young age, which allowed him to retire at the age of forty (Hollander, 1960). Kierkegaard had great admiration for his father, despite the fact that the man was “deeply melancholic, sternly religious, and carried a heavy burden of guilt which he imposed on his children” (McDonald, 2005). As a young man, he studied largely in his native city of Copenhagen and focused on philosophy. However, he constantly went through changes in character, possibly as his beliefs and own philosophy began to take shape. It is said that he went through “periods of indifference to [his] studies alternated with feverish activity and the doubts of the truth of Christianity”, which was to be the faith he would wrestle with for most of his academic life(Hollander, 1960, p.5). 
 Therefore, as the budding philosopher began to consider these ideas, he began writing dissertations and critical philosophical works. In fact, he prioritized his career to such an extent that he justified breaking of his engagement for that very calling, as he saw it (McDonald, 2005). He remained unmarried until his death in 1855.
    Soren Kierkegaard made a great many contributions to the realm of philosophy. He is noted as being one who “pitted a mode of reflection closer to the individuals’ concrete existence” (Kaufman, 1975, p. 83). That is to say, he did not see his philosophical reflections as merely theoretical, as his intellectual rival Hegel did, but as something that could and even should be lived out. He is, as mentioned, considered to be the father of existential thought, which places great emphasis on the individual and his experiences . One of his pivotal ideas was the idea that truth is subjectivity. This means that subjective truth is " the individual's relation to an object of knowledge" and that an individual maybe in "subjective truth even when related to an objective untruth" (Solomon & Sherman, 2003, p. 51). He has also written works on dread and freedom, faith, authority, sin, anxiety, despair, melancholy, the absurd, the Christian paradox, irony, inwardness, etc (McDonald, 2005).

    Many of Kierkegaard’s ideas both challenge and contribute to the Christian faith. He had interesting views on issues of faith and doctrine, and has indeed developed his own theology. For example, Kierkegaard claims that passionate faith is often found by those who hold absurd beliefs and to have faith, which ultimately cannot be explained by reason, one must take a "leap of faith" and "live it existentially" (French, 1970, p.416). These said beliefs are a target for rational attack, and even ridicule. Yet, we so often admire this type of passionate faith in Christianity.  It is pointed out that Kierkegaard, with “more of a sense of humor than most of his expositors”, asks why we wouldn’t admire such passionate faith in those who believe that Hitler was God or that a random person is a deity- especially, as he observes, nothing could be more absurd than Christianity (Kaufman, 1975, p. 85). This is a poignant admission by someone who himself holds to Christian belief. Kierkegaard admits and opens up dialogue to discuss the absurdity of faith, and admits that ultimately belief in the Christian God is a faith-based assumption. This is important, particularly in today's post modern culture, because many non-Christians are repulsed by Christians who claim to have the answers to everything.  At the same time, Kierkegaard wrote many works inspiring faith and supporting Christianity, but often challenging Christian institution. It is said that his later works especially began to develop a “grand theme which is fundamental to all his literary activity: how to become a Christian” (Hollander, 1960, p. 14. Therefore, Kierkegaard, as is evidenced by his work, went through all the struggles of the thinking, religious man- the quest to reconcile his so-called absurd beliefs with logic and rationality. 




Leave a Reply